Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs FLN
BRF vs FLN Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs FLN
BRF vs FLN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. FLN commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and FLN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLN has more net assets: 37.9M vs. BRF (21.9M). FLN has a higher annual dividend yield than BRF: FLN (17.405) vs BRF (1.774). BRF was incepted earlier than FLN: BRF (17 years) vs FLN (15 years). BRF (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover BRF (43.00) vs BRF (43.00).
| BRF | FLN | BRF / FLN | |
| Gain YTD | 1.774 | 17.405 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 21.9M | 37.9M | 58% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.80 | 75% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 100.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 5.47 | 3.38 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | FLN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| LGO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| NU - FLN | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.19% |