Ad is loading...
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$12.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
Volume$3.89K
Net Assets16.64M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$23.95
Change+$0.39 (+1.66%)
Volume$1.98K
Net Assets1.32B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Apr 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.32B vs. BRF (16.6M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (16.023) vs ILF (12.626). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (23 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.70). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 16.023 | 12.626 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 16.6M | 1.32B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.48 | 146% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 7.00 | 614% |
| Yield | 3.81 | 6.95 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 16 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with AZUL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then AZUL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.74% | ||
| SCCO - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
More | ||||