Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$14.78
Change-$0.25 (-1.66%)
Volume$956
Net Assets19.52M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.37
Change-$0.18 (-0.70%)
Volume$817.41K
Net Assets1.63B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.63B vs. BRF (19.5M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (34.368) vs ILF (24.187). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 34.368 | 24.187 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 19.5M | 1.63B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.48 | 125% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 3.10 | 6.16 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ILF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -1.65% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.92% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 46% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -1.63% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| NU - ILF | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.49% | ||
More | ||||