Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$14.38
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
Volume$22.79K
Net Assets18.76M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$25.40
Change-$0.08 (-0.31%)
Volume$1.85M
Net Assets1.68B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.68B vs. BRF (18.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (30.731) vs ILF (24.334). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (18.00) vs ILF (18.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 30.731 | 24.334 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 18.8M | 1.68B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.48 | 125% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 18.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 2.91 | 5.69 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 47% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 71% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
| NU - ILF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||