Ad is loading...
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
VanEck Brazil Small-Cap ETF
Price$13.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$1.18K
Net Assets17.77M
iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Price$24.91
Change+$0.17 (+0.69%)
Volume$4.42K
Net Assets1.44B
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a StrongBuy and ILF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 1.44B vs. BRF (17.8M). BRF has a higher annual dividend yield than ILF: BRF (24.350) vs ILF (19.082). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (16 years) vs ILF (24 years). ILF (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.70). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (7.00) vs ILF (7.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 24.350 | 19.082 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 17.8M | 1.44B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.48 | 146% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 7.00 | 614% |
| Yield | 3.51 | 6.61 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRF has been loosely correlated with INTR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRF jumps, then INTR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | -0.05% | ||
| INTR - BRF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 51% Loosely correlated | -26.54% | ||
| VINP - BRF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| AFYA - BRF | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with ITUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then ITUB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | +0.65% | ||
| ITUB - ILF | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GGB - ILF | 70% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.56% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| NU - ILF | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
More | ||||