Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts BRF vs ILF
BRF vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRF vs. ILF commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRF is a Hold and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 3.84B vs. BRF (21.9M). ILF has a higher annual dividend yield than BRF: ILF (17.640) vs BRF (1.774). BRF was incepted earlier than ILF: BRF (17 years) vs ILF (25 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BRF (0.60). BRF has a higher turnover ILF (10.00) vs ILF (10.00).
| BRF | ILF | BRF / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 1.774 | 17.640 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 21.9M | 3.84B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.47 | 128% |
| Turnover | 43.00 | 10.00 | 430% |
| Yield | 5.47 | 3.34 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BRF | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 88% | 11 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRF and PENG have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRF and PENG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PENG - BRF | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| AZUL - BRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.86% | ||
| ARCO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| LGO - BRF | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| VTEX - BRF | 3% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 84% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NU - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||