BRKWF
Price
$17.61
Change
+$2.09 (+13.47%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.83B
HLBZF
Price
$204.63
Change
+$2.05 (+1.01%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BRKWF vs HLBZF

Header iconBRKWF vs HLBZF Comparison
Open Charts BRKWF vs HLBZFBanner chart's image
Brickworks
Price$17.61
Change+$2.09 (+13.47%)
Volume$300
Capitalization2.83B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$204.63
Change+$2.05 (+1.01%)
Volume$5
Capitalization15.13B
BRKWF vs HLBZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BRKWF vs. HLBZF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRKWF is a Hold and HLBZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BRKWF: $17.61 vs. HLBZF: $204.63)
Brand notoriety: BRKWF and HLBZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BRKWF: 100% vs. HLBZF: 0%
Market capitalization -- BRKWF: $2.83B vs. HLBZF: $15.13B
BRKWF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.83B. HLBZF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BRKWF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHLBZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BRKWF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HLBZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BRKWF and HLBZF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BRKWF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLBZF (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLBZF is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-2.71% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLBZF($15.1B) has a higher market cap than BRKWF($2.83B). BRKWF has higher P/E ratio than HLBZF: BRKWF (10.35) vs HLBZF (8.46). HLBZF YTD gains are higher at: 63.048 vs. BRKWF (5.134). HLBZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. BRKWF (29.3M). HLBZF has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. BRKWF (187M). BRKWF has less debt than HLBZF: BRKWF (751M) vs HLBZF (8.71B). HLBZF has higher revenues than BRKWF: HLBZF (21.1B) vs BRKWF (1.14B).
BRKWFHLBZFBRKWF / HLBZF
Capitalization2.83B15.1B19%
EBITDA29.3M3.77B1%
Gain YTD5.13463.0488%
P/E Ratio10.358.46122%
Revenue1.14B21.1B5%
Total Cash187M1.75B11%
Total Debt751M8.71B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BRKWF vs HLBZF: Fundamental Ratings
BRKWF
HLBZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
711
SMR RATING
1..100
9597
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BRKWF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (16). This means that BRKWF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (11). This means that BRKWF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

BRKWF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as HLBZF (97). This means that BRKWF’s stock grew similarly to HLBZF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKWF (48). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to BRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

HLBZF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BRKWF (11). This means that HLBZF’s stock grew similarly to BRKWF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYPMX157.593.52
+2.28%
Rydex Precious Metals Inv
CIRFX73.880.16
+0.22%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F
BSCFX28.56-0.03
-0.10%
Baron Small Cap Retail
FSEIX52.80-0.16
-0.30%
Nuveen Mid Cap Value 1 I
LMCFX31.85-0.16
-0.50%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F

BRKWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BRKWF and HLBZF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRKWF and HLBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRKWF
1D Price
Change %
BRKWF100%
N/A
HLBZF - BRKWF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
WCHNF - BRKWF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBRBY - BRKWF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.00%
CXMSF - BRKWF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
BSND - BRKWF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HLBZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HLBZF and BRKWF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HLBZF and BRKWF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLBZF
1D Price
Change %
HLBZF100%
+1.02%
BRKWF - HLBZF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - HLBZF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
VMC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
BCC - HLBZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.88%
CRH - HLBZF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More