Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRMIX vs FSMDX
BRMIX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts BRMIX vs FSMDX
BRMIX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRMIX vs. FSMDX commentary
Sep 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRMIX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. BRMIX (2.67B). BRMIX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: BRMIX (1.31) vs FSMDX (0.76). BRMIX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: BRMIX (11 years) vs FSMDX (15 years). BRMIX (0.10) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). BRMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRMIX: FSMDX (0) vs BRMIX (2000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.58 vs. BRMIX (13.49). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.25 vs. BRMIX (26.55).
| BRMIX | FSMDX | BRMIX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.03 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.10 | 0.03 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.189 | 17.330 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 52.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.76 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 18.58 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.35 | 57.58 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.55 | 42.25 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.00 | 166.47 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers