Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRMKX vs FSMAX
BRMKX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BRMKX vs FSMAX
BRMKX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRMKX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRMKX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BRMKX (2.59B). BRMKX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: BRMKX (1.33) vs FSMAX (0.49). BRMKX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BRMKX (11 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BRMKX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BRMKX (17.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRMKX: FSMAX (0) vs BRMKX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. BRMKX (9.48). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. BRMKX (26.32).
| BRMKX | FSMAX | BRMKX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.04 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.840 | 13.370 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.59B | 40.1B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.49 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.48 | 13.05 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.64 | 63.92 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.32 | 32.77 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 107.50 | 133.42 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers