It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRQSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEEFT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRQSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEFT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRQSF (@Computer Communications) experienced а +20.00% price change this week, while EEFT (@Computer Communications) price change was +5.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +3.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 17, 2025.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
BRQSF | EEFT | BRQSF / EEFT | |
Capitalization | 5.22M | 4.01B | 0% |
EBITDA | N/A | 668M | - |
Gain YTD | -27.913 | -4.979 | 561% |
P/E Ratio | 0.33 | 13.48 | 2% |
Revenue | N/A | 4.05B | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 2.09B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 2.35B | - |
BRQSF | EEFT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 39 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 12 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRQSF's Valuation (52) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as EEFT (55) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
BRQSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's SMR Rating (39) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRQSF (100) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.
BRQSF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Miscellaneous industry is in the same range as EEFT (78) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that BRQSF’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
EEFT's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as BRQSF (92) in the Miscellaneous industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to BRQSF’s over the last 12 months.
BRQSF | EEFT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago76% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago89% | 1 day ago69% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago66% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago64% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago67% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago65% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 14 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BRQSF and COIN have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BRQSF and COIN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRQSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BRQSF | 100% | +0.17% | ||
COIN - BRQSF | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
EEFT - BRQSF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.91% | ||
GDDY - BRQSF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
SOS - BRQSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.45% | ||
SBIG - BRQSF | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEFT | 100% | +2.91% | ||
CPAY - EEFT | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.33% | ||
DOX - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.48% | ||
SSNC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
EVTC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
GEHC - EEFT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
More |