Advertisement
CPAY vs EEFT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAY is a Hold and EEFT is a Hold.
| CPAY | EEFT | CPAY / EEFT | |
| Capitalization | 26.1B | 2.47B | 1,057% |
| EBITDA | 2.55B | 686M | 372% |
| Gain YTD | 32.177 | -13.244 | -243% |
| P/E Ratio | 24.19 | 10.48 | 231% |
| Revenue | 5.02B | 4.38B | 115% |
| Total Cash | 3.16B | 2.18B | 145% |
| Total Debt | 10.6B | 2.81B | 378% |
CPAY | EEFT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 33 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EEFT's Valuation (26) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as CPAY (52) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that EEFT’s stock grew similarly to CPAY’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EEFT (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's SMR Rating (33) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (43) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (59) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
CPAY's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as EEFT (59) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that CPAY’s stock grew similarly to EEFT’s over the last 12 months.
| CPAY | EEFT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 54% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 67% | 11 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPAY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while EEFT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CPAY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- EEFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EEFT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- EEFT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CPAY (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.56% price change this week, while EEFT (@Computer Communications) price change was -8.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.94%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
EEFT is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+1.11% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
Advertisement
CPAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPAY has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPAY jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPAY | 100% | -1.61% | ||
| HUBS - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.86% | ||
| SSNC - CPAY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| ADSK - CPAY | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| CRM - CPAY | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| PCOR - CPAY | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||
EEFT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEFT has been loosely correlated with SSNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEFT jumps, then SSNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEFT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEFT | 100% | -2.70% | ||
| SSNC - EEFT | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| GEHC - EEFT | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| ROP - EEFT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| NATL - EEFT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ALIT - EEFT | 54% Loosely correlated | -4.23% | ||
More | ||||