It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINVH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INVH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BRT (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while INVH (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.81%.
BRT is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
INVH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| BRT | INVH | BRT / INVH | |
| Capitalization | 270M | 17.7B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 40M | 1.64B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -12.924 | -7.198 | 180% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.75 | 32.44 | 271% |
| Revenue | 95.9M | 2.68B | 4% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 482M | 8.18B | 6% |
BRT | INVH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BRT's Valuation (50) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as INVH (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
BRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as INVH (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew similarly to INVH’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's SMR Rating (84) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BRT (94) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to BRT’s over the last 12 months.
INVH's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BRT (75) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that INVH’s stock grew similarly to BRT’s over the last 12 months.
BRT's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for INVH (82) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that BRT’s stock grew significantly faster than INVH’s over the last 12 months.
| BRT | INVH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 56% | 16 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 46% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MSFY | 27.21 | 0.15 | +0.55% |
| Kurv Yield Premium Str Microsoft ETF | |||
| XSD | 345.28 | 1.42 | +0.41% |
| SPDR® S&P Semiconductor ETF | |||
| TCAL | 24.60 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Premium Income ETF | |||
| EWN | 58.91 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | |||
| AMUB | 18.19 | N/A | N/A |
| UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP ETN Series B | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRT has been loosely correlated with NXRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRT jumps, then NXRT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRT | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| NXRT - BRT | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| VRE - BRT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| LXP - BRT | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| BFS - BRT | 53% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| INVH - BRT | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INVH has been closely correlated with AMH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INVH jumps, then AMH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INVH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INVH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| AMH - INVH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| UDR - INVH | 80% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| EQR - INVH | 79% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ESS - INVH | 77% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| CPT - INVH | 76% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||