Ad is loading...
BRUDX vs RMFCX
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMFCX
MFS Blended Research Value Equity A
Price$14.99
Change+$0.16 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.93M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. BRUDX (276M). BRUDX (1.41) and RMFCX (1.34) have matching dividends . BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUDX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BRUDX (0.85). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMFCX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. BRUDX (-7.24). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.63 vs. BRUDX (44.45).
| BRUDX | RMFCX | BRUDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.91 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.91 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.513 | -3.599 | 98% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 96.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.24 | 1.37 | -528% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.60 | 7.19 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.45 | 50.63 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.64 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...