Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUDX vs RMFCX
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMFCX
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. BRUDX (331M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUDX: RMFCX (1.19) vs BRUDX (1.10). BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUDX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BRUDX (0.69). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMFCX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). BRUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.68 vs. RMFCX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.04 vs. BRUDX (14.30).
| BRUDX | RMFCX | BRUDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.708 | 6.510 | 211% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.68 | 10.31 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.31 | 35.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.30 | 34.04 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.93 | 92.67 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement