Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUDX vs RMFCX
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BRUDX vs RMFCX
BRUDX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRUDX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRUDX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BRUDX (336M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than BRUDX: RMFCX (1.15) vs BRUDX (1.03). BRUDX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BRUDX (11 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than BRUDX (0.69). BRUDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RMFCX (30.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRUDX: RMFCX (250) vs BRUDX (1000). BRUDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.63 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. BRUDX (22.48).
| BRUDX | RMFCX | BRUDX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.91 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.478 | 9.496 | 226% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.15 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.63 | 9.09 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.53 | 33.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.48 | 37.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.52 | 92.36 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement