Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs FFMMX
BRUKX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs FFMMX
BRUKX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BRUKX (336M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: FFMMX (1.64) vs BRUKX (0.84). BRUKX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: BRUKX (11 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). BRUKX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: BRUKX (0) vs FFMMX (250). BRUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.15 vs. FFMMX (9.76). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. BRUKX (21.56).
| BRUKX | FFMMX | BRUKX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.36 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.36 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.268 | 9.858 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.64 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.15 | 9.76 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.12 | 35.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.56 | 41.13 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement