Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRUKX vs FFMMX
BRUKX vs FFMMX Comparison
Open Charts BRUKX vs FFMMX
BRUKX vs FFMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. BRUKX (339M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than BRUKX: FFMMX (1.67) vs BRUKX (0.89). BRUKX was incepted earlier than FFMMX: BRUKX (11 years) vs FFMMX (6 years). BRUKX (0.94) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). BRUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). BRUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMMX: BRUKX (0) vs FFMMX (250). BRUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. FFMMX (9.92). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 39.66 vs. BRUKX (18.67).
| BRUKX | FFMMX | BRUKX / FFMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.36 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.36 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.720 | 6.654 | 251% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 339M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.67 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.52 | 9.92 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.59 | 37.31 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.67 | 39.66 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement