Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRWCX vs RGAHX
BRWCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BRWCX vs RGAHX
BRWCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRWCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWCX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. BRWCX (783M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BRWCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs BRWCX (0.00). BRWCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BRWCX (11 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). BRWCX (1.43) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BRWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BRWCX: RGAHX (250) vs BRWCX (1000). BRWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.27 vs. RGAHX (0.18). BRWCX return over 5 years is better than : 25.31 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| BRWCX | RGAHX | BRWCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.44 | 316% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.43 | 0.44 | 325% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.176 | 9.200 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 783M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 0.18 | 1,264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.97 | 43.47 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.31 | 13.78 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.20 | 106.68 | 156% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement