Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BRWJX vs RGACX
BRWJX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts BRWJX vs RGACX
BRWJX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BRWJX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BRWJX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. BRWJX (741M). BRWJX pays higher dividends than RGACX: BRWJX (0.17) vs RGACX (0.00). BRWJX was incepted earlier than RGACX: BRWJX (11 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than BRWJX (0.43). BRWJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). BRWJX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: BRWJX (0) vs RGACX (250). BRWJX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.13 vs. RGACX (4.91). BRWJX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. RGACX (14.55).
| BRWJX | RGACX | BRWJX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.93 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.93 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.116 | 8.689 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 741M | 357B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.13 | 4.91 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.49 | 42.12 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.26 | 14.55 | 263% |
| Returns for 10 years | 196.66 | 101.35 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement