Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCFX vs WCMLX
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BSCFX vs WCMLX
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSCFX has more cash in the bank: 3.45B vs. WCMLX (41.3M). BSCFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BSCFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BSCFX (28 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BSCFX (1.30). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BSCFX (10.00). BSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BSCFX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.04 vs. BSCFX (-20.03). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. BSCFX (-25.54).
| BSCFX | WCMLX | BSCFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.99 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.79 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.654 | 1.788 | -316% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 41.3M | 8,349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -20.03 | -3.04 | 659% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.86 | 21.43 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -25.54 | -0.83 | 3,065% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers