Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCFX vs WCMLX
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BSCFX vs WCMLX
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCFX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSCFX has more cash in the bank: 2.79B vs. WCMLX (52.4M). BSCFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BSCFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BSCFX (29 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BSCFX (1.32). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BSCFX (13.00). BSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BSCFX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.84 vs. BSCFX (-7.52). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -0.07 vs. BSCFX (-30.82).
| BSCFX | WCMLX | BSCFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.99 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.939 | 9.375 | -21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 52.4M | 5,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.52 | 25.84 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.64 | 32.13 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -30.82 | -0.07 | 46,415% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement