Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSCFX vs WCMLX
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BSCFX vs WCMLX
BSCFX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSCFX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSCFX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSCFX has more cash in the bank: 2.53B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). BSCFX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BSCFX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BSCFX (29 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BSCFX (1.32). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BSCFX (13.00). BSCFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BSCFX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. BSCFX (-13.57). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. BSCFX (-36.72).
| BSCFX | WCMLX | BSCFX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 0.99 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.32 | 1.79 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.829 | 3.852 | -47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 47.2M | 5,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.57 | 2.81 | -484% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.68 | 23.40 | -29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -36.72 | -7.51 | 489% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers