BSEAF
Price
$3.11
Change
+$0.01 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
93.34M
BWLP
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.81B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEAF vs BWLP

Header iconBSEAF vs BWLP Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs BWLPBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$3.11
Change+$0.01 (+0.32%)
Volume$301
Capitalization93.34M
BW LPG
Price$12.00
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$2.37K
Capitalization1.81B
BSEAF vs BWLP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. BWLP commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and BWLP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $3.11 vs. BWLP: $11.98)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and BWLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 21% vs. BWLP: 40%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $93.34M vs. BWLP: $1.81B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $93.34M. BWLP’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBWLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than BSEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWLP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWLP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while BWLP (@Marine Shipping) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.08% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.81B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($93.3M). BSEAF has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: BSEAF (13.78) vs BWLP (6.41). BSEAF YTD gains are higher at: 20.543 vs. BWLP (12.552). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 583M vs. BSEAF (16M). BWLP has more cash in the bank: 283M vs. BSEAF (26M). BSEAF has less debt than BWLP: BSEAF (28.2M) vs BWLP (1.13B). BWLP has higher revenues than BSEAF: BWLP (3.39B) vs BSEAF (154M).
BSEAFBWLPBSEAF / BWLP
Capitalization93.3M1.81B5%
EBITDA16M583M3%
Gain YTD20.54312.552164%
P/E Ratio13.786.41215%
Revenue154M3.39B5%
Total Cash26M283M9%
Total Debt28.2M1.13B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9364
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4839
SMR RATING
1..100
8254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9225
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWLP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (19). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (48). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (82). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (59). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSEAF (92). This means that BWLP’s stock grew significantly faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMSIX36.480.30
+0.83%
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock S
VLISX583.77N/A
N/A
Vanguard Large Cap Index Institutional
VRREX18.46N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Real Estate Secs R6
VRMGX63.59N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth R6
ESGEX20.51N/A
N/A
Reynders McVeigh Core Equity Instl

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
N/A
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
-0.42%
HAFN - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
ECO - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
SB - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
SFL - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
GNK - BWLP
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.85%
More