BSEAF
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.50 (-14.71%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
91.44M
BWLP
Price
$13.04
Change
+$0.13 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.98B
39 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEAF vs BWLP

Header iconBSEAF vs BWLP Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs BWLPBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$2.90
Change-$0.50 (-14.71%)
Volume$900
Capitalization91.44M
BW LPG
Price$13.04
Change+$0.13 (+1.01%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization1.98B
BSEAF vs BWLP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. BWLP commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and BWLP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $2.90 vs. BWLP: $12.91)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and BWLP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 205% vs. BWLP: 47%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $91.44M vs. BWLP: $1.98B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $91.44M. BWLP’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBWLP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BWLP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the long-term than BSEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSEAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWLP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSEAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BWLP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWLP is a better buy in the short-term than BSEAF.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -6.75% price change this week, while BWLP (@Marine Shipping) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWLP is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.38% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWLP($1.98B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($91.4M). BSEAF has higher P/E ratio than BWLP: BSEAF (13.06) vs BWLP (6.97). BWLP YTD gains are higher at: 22.417 vs. BSEAF (12.403). BWLP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 583M vs. BSEAF (16M). BWLP has more cash in the bank: 283M vs. BSEAF (26M). BSEAF has less debt than BWLP: BSEAF (28.2M) vs BWLP (1.13B). BWLP has higher revenues than BSEAF: BWLP (3.39B) vs BSEAF (154M).
BSEAFBWLPBSEAF / BWLP
Capitalization91.4M1.98B5%
EBITDA16M583M3%
Gain YTD12.40322.41755%
P/E Ratio13.066.97187%
Revenue154M3.39B5%
Total Cash26M283M9%
Total Debt28.2M1.13B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs BWLP: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
BWLP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
899
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5936
SMR RATING
1..100
8254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWLP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (16). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (59). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (82). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (63). This means that BWLP’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWLP's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSEAF (92). This means that BWLP’s stock grew significantly faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSEAFBWLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIDKX56.41N/A
N/A
Fidelity International Discovery K
IGLGX20.44N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Global Equity A
TWQAX15.55N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Cap Value A
SMSAX9.94N/A
N/A
SEI Multi Strategy Alternatives F (SIMT)
JECTX17.41N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq C

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
N/A
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.93%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+1.22%
More

BWLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWLP has been loosely correlated with HAFN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWLP jumps, then HAFN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLP
1D Price
Change %
BWLP100%
+0.93%
HAFN - BWLP
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
ECO - BWLP
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.93%
GNK - BWLP
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
SFL - BWLP
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.70%
SB - BWLP
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
More