BSEAF
Price
$2.58
Change
-$0.31 (-10.73%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
Capitalization
103.08M
CMHHF
Price
$1.61
Change
-$0.08 (-4.71%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.06B
Ad is loading...

BSEAF vs CMHHF

Header iconBSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs CMHHFBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$2.58
Change-$0.31 (-10.73%)
Volume$105
Capitalization103.08M
China Merchants Port Holdings
Price$1.61
Change-$0.08 (-4.71%)
Volume$43.27K
Capitalization7.06B
BSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. CMHHF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and CMHHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $2.58 vs. CMHHF: $1.62)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and CMHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 10% vs. CMHHF: 132%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $103.08M vs. CMHHF: $7.06B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $103.08M. CMHHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $7.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $29.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHHF is a better buy in the long-term than BSEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSEAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BSEAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMHHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMHHF($7.06B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($103M). BSEAF has higher P/E ratio than CMHHF: BSEAF (14.59) vs CMHHF (7.16). BSEAF (0.000) and CMHHF (0.000) have similar YTD gains .
BSEAFCMHHFBSEAF / CMHHF
Capitalization103M7.06B1%
EBITDA16MN/A-
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E Ratio14.597.16204%
Revenue154MN/A-
Total Cash26MN/A-
Total Debt28.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs CMHHF: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
CMHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
8276
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSEAF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHHF (17). This means that BSEAF’s stock grew similarly to CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (100). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (82). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSEAF (91). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSEAF (91). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSEAFCMHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
31%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRDVX19.820.12
+0.61%
BlackRock Equity Dividend R
FGSAX60.320.29
+0.48%
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
DDICX14.930.07
+0.47%
Macquarie Wealth Builder C
AUXIX30.460.14
+0.46%
Auxier Focus Institutional
RECIX11.940.02
+0.17%
RBC Emerging Markets Ex-China Equity I

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
N/A
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.59%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMHHF and HHULY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMHHF and HHULY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHHF100%
N/A
HHULY - CMHHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CMHHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.53%
CSPKY - CMHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - CMHHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOF - CMHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More