BSEAF
Price
$3.44
Change
+$0.39 (+12.79%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
98.02M
CMHHF
Price
$1.95
Change
-$0.11 (-5.34%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
7.75B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEAF vs CMHHF

Header iconBSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs CMHHFBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$3.44
Change+$0.39 (+12.79%)
Volume$377
Capitalization98.02M
China Merchants Port Holdings
Price$1.95
Change-$0.11 (-5.34%)
Volume$200
Capitalization7.75B
BSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. CMHHF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and CMHHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $3.44 vs. CMHHF: $1.95)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and CMHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 26% vs. CMHHF: 6%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $98.02M vs. CMHHF: $7.75B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $98.02M. CMHHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $7.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMHHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSEAF is a better buy in the long-term than CMHHF.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CMHHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+3.71% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMHHF($7.75B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($98M). BSEAF has higher P/E ratio than CMHHF: BSEAF (15.31) vs CMHHF (8.11). BSEAF YTD gains are higher at: 33.333 vs. CMHHF (20.743).
BSEAFCMHHFBSEAF / CMHHF
Capitalization98M7.75B1%
EBITDA16MN/A-
Gain YTD33.33320.743161%
P/E Ratio15.318.11189%
Revenue154MN/A-
Total Cash26MN/A-
Total Debt28.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs CMHHF: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
CMHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4398
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4474
SMR RATING
1..100
8475
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHHF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (20). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

BSEAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CMHHF (74). This means that BSEAF’s stock grew similarly to CMHHF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (84). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (47). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSEAF (87). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IVINX38.480.16
+0.42%
Macquarie Global Growth Fund Class A
MCIMX21.76N/A
N/A
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value C
MDDCX24.24N/A
N/A
BlackRock Emerging Mkts Inv A
RMOYX24.91N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth Y
JRACX74.59N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research C

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
N/A
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMHHF and HHULY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMHHF and HHULY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHHF100%
N/A
HHULY - CMHHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CMHHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.92%
CSPKY - CMHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - CMHHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOF - CMHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More