BSEAF
Price
$2.81
Change
-$0.19 (-6.33%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
98.19M
CMHHF
Price
$1.88
Change
+$0.04 (+2.17%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSEAF vs CMHHF

Header iconBSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison
Open Charts BSEAF vs CMHHFBanner chart's image
Braemar Shipping Services
Price$2.81
Change-$0.19 (-6.33%)
Volume$105
Capitalization98.19M
China Merchants Port Holdings
Price$1.88
Change+$0.04 (+2.17%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization8.2B
BSEAF vs CMHHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSEAF vs. CMHHF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSEAF is a Hold and CMHHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BSEAF: $2.81 vs. CMHHF: $1.88)
Brand notoriety: BSEAF and CMHHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSEAF: 9% vs. CMHHF: 400%
Market capitalization -- BSEAF: $98.19M vs. CMHHF: $8.2B
BSEAF [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $98.19M. CMHHF’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $8.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $33.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSEAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMHHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BSEAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMHHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMHHF is a better buy in the long-term than BSEAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSEAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMHHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSEAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMHHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BSEAF is a better buy in the short-term than CMHHF.

Price Growth

BSEAF (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -17.65% price change this week, while CMHHF (@Marine Shipping) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was +0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (+0.28% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMHHF($8.2B) has a higher market cap than BSEAF($98.2M). BSEAF has higher P/E ratio than CMHHF: BSEAF (12.58) vs CMHHF (7.77). CMHHF YTD gains are higher at: 16.409 vs. BSEAF (8.915).
BSEAFCMHHFBSEAF / CMHHF
Capitalization98.2M8.2B1%
EBITDA16MN/A-
Gain YTD8.91516.40954%
P/E Ratio12.587.77162%
Revenue154MN/A-
Total Cash26MN/A-
Total Debt28.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSEAF vs CMHHF: Fundamental Ratings
BSEAF
CMHHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9035
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6951
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5045

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMHHF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (22). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (69). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (100). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (61). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

CMHHF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BSEAF (100). This means that CMHHF’s stock grew similarly to BSEAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSEAFCMHHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSEAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMHHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKF54.080.73
+1.37%
ARK Fintech Innovation ETF
MIDU51.470.20
+0.39%
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X ETF
STAX25.580.04
+0.14%
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
BSMQ23.55N/A
-0.02%
Invesco BulletShares 2026 Muncpl Bd ETF
SMCY15.41-1.36
-8.11%
YieldMax SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF

BSEAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BSEAF and CKNHF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BSEAF and CKNHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSEAF
1D Price
Change %
BSEAF100%
-6.43%
CKNHF - BSEAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BWLP - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
CMHHF - BSEAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - BSEAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSDXF - BSEAF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CMHHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMHHF and HHULY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMHHF and HHULY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMHHF
1D Price
Change %
CMHHF100%
N/A
HHULY - CMHHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOY - CMHHF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
CSPKY - CMHHF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DLPTF - CMHHF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CICOF - CMHHF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More