Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSFIX vs NRGSX
BSFIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSFIX vs NRGSX
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
BSFIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSFIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSFIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. BSFIX (3.45B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BSFIX: NRGSX (0.07) vs BSFIX (0.00). BSFIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BSFIX (16 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). BSFIX (1.05) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. BSFIX (10.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSFIX: NRGSX (0) vs BSFIX (1000000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.62 vs. BSFIX (-18.98). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. BSFIX (-22.34).
| BSFIX | NRGSX | BSFIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.74 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.458 | -7.590 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 8.19B | 42% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.98 | -14.62 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.44 | -4.10 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.34 | -11.01 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.71 | 3.70 | -127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers