Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSFIX vs NRGSX
BSFIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts BSFIX vs NRGSX
BSFIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSFIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSFIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. BSFIX (2.53B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than BSFIX: NRGSX (0.44) vs BSFIX (0.00). BSFIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: BSFIX (17 years) vs NRGSX (14 years). BSFIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BSFIX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSFIX: NRGSX (0) vs BSFIX (1000000). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.11 vs. BSFIX (-12.59). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -23.14 vs. BSFIX (-33.82).
| BSFIX | NRGSX | BSFIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.74 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.74 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.620 | 11.425 | -14% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 6.95B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.59 | -8.11 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.94 | 2.69 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.82 | -23.14 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.00 | 10.53 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers