Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSFIX vs WCMLX
BSFIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BSFIX vs WCMLX
BSFIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSFIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSFIX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSFIX has more cash in the bank: 2.53B vs. WCMLX (47.2M). BSFIX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BSFIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BSFIX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BSFIX (1.06). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BSFIX (13.00). WCMLX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSFIX: WCMLX (100000) vs BSFIX (1000000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. BSFIX (-12.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -7.51 vs. BSFIX (-33.82).
| BSFIX | WCMLX | BSFIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 0.99 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.79 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.620 | 3.852 | -42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.53B | 47.2M | 5,354% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.59 | 2.81 | -449% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.94 | 23.40 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -33.82 | -7.51 | 450% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement