Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSGRX vs WCMLX
BSGRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BSGRX vs WCMLX
BSGRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSGRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSGRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSGRX has more cash in the bank: 839M vs. WCMLX (51.3M). BSGRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BSGRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BSGRX (8 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BSGRX (1.35). BSGRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 144.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). BSGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BSGRX (100) vs WCMLX (100000). BSGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.05 vs. WCMLX (13.30). BSGRX return over 5 years is better than : 6.54 vs. WCMLX (-0.33).
| BSGRX | WCMLX | BSGRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.79 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.138 | 11.410 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 839M | 51.3M | 1,635% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.05 | 13.30 | 226% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.20 | 32.16 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.54 | -0.33 | -2,010% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement