Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSMAX vs FSSNX
BSMAX vs FSSNX Comparison
Open Charts BSMAX vs FSSNX
BSMAX vs FSSNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSMAX vs. FSSNX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSMAX is a Hold and FSSNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSSNX has more cash in the bank: 34.1B vs. BSMAX (1.34B). FSSNX pays higher dividends than BSMAX: FSSNX (1.06) vs BSMAX (0.92). BSMAX was incepted earlier than FSSNX: BSMAX (11 years) vs FSSNX (15 years). BSMAX (0.39) is less costly to investors than FSSNX (0.03). BSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSSNX (14.00). FSSNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSMAX: FSSNX (0) vs BSMAX (1000). FSSNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.31 vs. BSMAX (28.28). FSSNX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. BSMAX (32.95).
| BSMAX | FSSNX | BSMAX / FSSNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 0.03 | 1,480% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.03 | 1,560% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.340 | 18.919 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.34B | 34.1B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 1.06 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.28 | 34.31 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.78 | 53.64 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.95 | 38.13 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 141.34 | 146.34 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers