Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BSTSX vs SLMCX
BSTSX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts BSTSX vs SLMCX
BSTSX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BSTSX vs. SLMCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSTSX is a StrongBuy and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 28.7B vs. BSTSX (8.3B). BSTSX pays higher dividends than SLMCX: BSTSX (0.93) vs SLMCX (0.00). BSTSX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: BSTSX (26 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). BSTSX (1.21) and SLMCX (1.16) have similar cost to investors . BSTSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. SLMCX (33.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BSTSX: SLMCX (2000) vs BSTSX (5000). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 81.82 vs. BSTSX (32.08). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 89.45 vs. BSTSX (47.91).
| BSTSX | SLMCX | BSTSX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.16 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.16 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.583 | 52.827 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 28.7B | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.08 | 81.82 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 99.63 | 120.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.91 | 89.45 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 482.95 | 320.14 | 151% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement