BSVN
Price
$36.00
Change
+$0.26 (+0.73%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
258.16M
90 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$27.97
Change
-$0.44 (-1.55%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
629.13M
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BSVN vs MCBS

Header iconBSVN vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BSVN vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Bank7
Price$36.00
Change+$0.26 (+0.73%)
Volume$200
Capitalization258.16M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$27.97
Change-$0.44 (-1.55%)
Volume$900
Capitalization629.13M
BSVN vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSVN vs. MCBS commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSVN is a StrongBuy and MCBS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BSVN: $35.60 vs. MCBS: $28.41)
Brand notoriety: BSVN and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSVN: 80% vs. MCBS: 92%
Market capitalization -- BSVN: $258.16M vs. MCBS: $629.13M
BSVN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $258.16M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the long-term than BSVN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSVN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSVN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than BSVN.

Price Growth

BSVN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.31% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSVN is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.02% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($629M) has a higher market cap than BSVN($258M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than BSVN: MCBS (11.86) vs BSVN (9.16). MCBS YTD gains are higher at: -11.688 vs. BSVN (-23.235). MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BSVN (169M). BSVN has less debt than MCBS: BSVN (4.8M) vs MCBS (334M). MCBS has higher revenues than BSVN: MCBS (118M) vs BSVN (91.8M).
BSVNMCBSBSVN / MCBS
Capitalization258M629M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-23.235-11.688199%
P/E Ratio9.1611.8677%
Revenue91.8M118M78%
Total Cash169M251M67%
Total Debt4.8M334M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSVN vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
BSVN
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
625
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1324
SMR RATING
1..100
1312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSVN's Valuation (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (90) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (24) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (13) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (64) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSVNMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EGOCX15.03N/A
N/A
Allspring Large Cap Core C
FEVRX21.19N/A
N/A
First Eagle US R6
ITHIX37.80N/A
N/A
Hartford Capital Appreciation I
SMIPX12.12N/A
N/A
Saratoga Mid Capitalization I
MEMLX13.35N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst EMkts Ldrs C

BSVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSVN has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BSVN jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSVN
1D Price
Change %
BSVN100%
-0.61%
EFSC - BSVN
67%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
MCBS - BSVN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
TMP - BSVN
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
FBK - BSVN
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
NWBI - BSVN
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-1.41%
CTBI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
IBOC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
FFBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
BFC - MCBS
85%
Closely correlated
+0.37%
More