BSVN
Price
$37.45
Change
-$1.93 (-4.90%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
258.16M
20 days until earnings call
MCBS
Price
$25.75
Change
-$1.97 (-7.11%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
629.13M
14 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BSVN vs MCBS

Header iconBSVN vs MCBS Comparison
Open Charts BSVN vs MCBSBanner chart's image
Bank7
Price$37.45
Change-$1.93 (-4.90%)
Volume$52.98K
Capitalization258.16M
MetroCity Bankshares
Price$25.75
Change-$1.97 (-7.11%)
Volume$61.24K
Capitalization629.13M
BSVN vs MCBS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSVN vs. MCBS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSVN is a Buy and MCBS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BSVN: $37.45 vs. MCBS: $25.75)
Brand notoriety: BSVN and MCBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSVN: 220% vs. MCBS: 174%
Market capitalization -- BSVN: $258.16M vs. MCBS: $629.13M
BSVN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $258.16M. MCBS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $629.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BSVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BSVN is a better buy in the long-term than MCBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSVN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCBS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSVN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MCBS is a better buy in the short-term than BSVN.

Price Growth

BSVN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.80% price change this week, while MCBS (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSVN is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

MCBS is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.56% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCBS($629M) has a higher market cap than BSVN($258M). MCBS has higher P/E ratio than BSVN: MCBS (11.86) vs BSVN (9.16). MCBS (-18.814) and BSVN (-19.246) have similar YTD gains . MCBS has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. BSVN (169M). BSVN has less debt than MCBS: BSVN (4.8M) vs MCBS (334M). MCBS has higher revenues than BSVN: MCBS (118M) vs BSVN (91.8M).
BSVNMCBSBSVN / MCBS
Capitalization258M629M41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.246-18.814102%
P/E Ratio9.1611.8677%
Revenue91.8M118M78%
Total Cash169M251M67%
Total Debt4.8M334M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSVN vs MCBS: Fundamental Ratings
BSVN
MCBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
114
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
830
SMR RATING
1..100
2525
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSVN's Valuation (85) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (89) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (30) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's SMR Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (25) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

BSVN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCBS (58) in the null industry. This means that BSVN’s stock grew similarly to MCBS’s over the last 12 months.

MCBS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BSVN (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCBS’s stock grew similarly to BSVN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSVNMCBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BSVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARIHX7.78N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity I
PXWEX31.64N/A
N/A
Impax Ellevate Global Women's Ldr Inv
FASMX20.60N/A
N/A
Fidelity Asset Manager 50%
PCSMX13.52N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap Growth I R6
WFEHX13.61N/A
N/A
Allspring International Equity R6

BSVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSVN has been loosely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSVN jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BSVN
1D Price
Change %
BSVN100%
-4.90%
EFSC - BSVN
66%
Loosely correlated
-9.85%
TMP - BSVN
63%
Loosely correlated
-8.16%
PRK - BSVN
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.25%
MCBS - BSVN
63%
Loosely correlated
-7.11%
FFBC - BSVN
63%
Loosely correlated
-8.84%
More

MCBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCBS has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCBS jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCBS
1D Price
Change %
MCBS100%
-7.11%
CTBI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-6.09%
UBSI - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-6.83%
FFBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-8.84%
FCBC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-7.45%
IBOC - MCBS
86%
Closely correlated
-7.53%
More