Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPACX
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPACX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$61.72
Change-$0.55 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.25M
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPACX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FPACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. BTBFX (546M). FPACX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPACX (3.02) vs BTBFX (1.46). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPACX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FPACX (32 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPACX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.47 vs. BTBFX (0.80). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.32 vs. BTBFX (28.21).
| BTBFX | FPACX | BTBFX / FPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.08 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.162 | 5.373 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 10.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 3.02 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 4.47 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.74 | 35.00 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | 43.32 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.46 | 31.52 | 204% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers