Ad is loading...
BTBFX vs FPACX
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPACX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$60.09
Change+$0.21 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets533.12M
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPACX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FPACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. BTBFX (533M). FPACX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPACX (2.94) vs BTBFX (1.50). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPACX: BTBFX (29 years) vs FPACX (32 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.82). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPACX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.68 vs. BTBFX (-0.33). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 45.44 vs. BTBFX (26.66).
| BTBFX | FPACX | BTBFX / FPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.06 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.08 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.824 | 0.846 | -334% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 533M | 10.3B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 2.94 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 1.68 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.37 | 26.66 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.66 | 45.44 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.06 | 25.32 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers