Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPACX
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPACX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$65.28
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.41M
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. BTBFX (555M). FPACX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPACX (1.89) vs BTBFX (1.37). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPACX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FPACX (32 years). FPACX (1.08) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPACX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.24 vs. BTBFX (0.02). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.79 vs. BTBFX (20.19).
| BTBFX | FPACX | BTBFX / FPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.06 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.08 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.696 | 11.830 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 11.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 7.24 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.12 | 38.66 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.19 | 35.79 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.09 | 42.53 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers