Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPACX
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPACX
BTBFX vs FPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPACX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPACX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. BTBFX (531M). FPACX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPACX (2.56) vs BTBFX (1.23). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPACX: BTBFX (31 years) vs FPACX (33 years). FPACX (1.09) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.78). FPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BTBFX (10.65). FPACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPACX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.97 vs. BTBFX (-0.29). FPACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.80 vs. BTBFX (3.41).
| BTBFX | FPACX | BTBFX / FPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.09 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.563 | 8.617 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.56 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 8.97 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 34.23 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | 24.80 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.81 | 57.40 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement