Ad is loading...
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$60.31
Change-$0.74 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets552.66M
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$40.35
Change-$0.11 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. BTBFX (553M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (2.87) vs BTBFX (1.43). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (29 years) vs FPCSX (5 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.82). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPCSX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. BTBFX (2.05).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.99 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.02 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.925 | 0.522 | -177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 553M | 10.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 2.87 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 3.87 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.91 | 21.29 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.52 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers