Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$61.72
Change-$0.55 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets546.25M
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$42.42
Change-$0.40 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.76B
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.8B vs. BTBFX (546M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (3.03) vs BTBFX (1.46). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FPCSX (5 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). BTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: BTBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.53 vs. BTBFX (0.80).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.00 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.02 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.162 | 5.391 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 10.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 3.03 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.80 | 4.53 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.74 | 35.29 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.21 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers