Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$65.28
Change+$0.15 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets555.41M
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$44.88
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.63B
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.6B vs. BTBFX (555M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (1.88) vs BTBFX (1.37). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FPCSX (5 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). BTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: BTBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.33 vs. BTBFX (0.02). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. BTBFX (20.19).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.00 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.02 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.696 | 11.881 | 48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 555M | 11.6B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.37 | 1.88 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.02 | 7.33 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.12 | 38.91 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.19 | 36.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers