Ad is loading...
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$57.97
Change-$0.11 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.57M
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$38.91
Change+$0.12 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.39B
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.4B vs. BTBFX (518M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (2.95) vs BTBFX (1.48). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (29 years) vs FPCSX (5 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.82). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). FPCSX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: FPCSX (1500) vs BTBFX (100000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.67 vs. BTBFX (-1.09).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.99 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.02 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.745 | -3.329 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 1500 | 6,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 518M | 10.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.48 | 2.95 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.09 | 0.67 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.53 | 13.83 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.54 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.88 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...