Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
Boston Trust Asset Management
Price$64.20
Change+$0.27 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets559.92M
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$43.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.14B
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Buy and FPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 11.1B vs. BTBFX (560M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (1.99) vs BTBFX (1.43). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (30 years) vs FPCSX (5 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.80). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.00 vs. BTBFX (7.52). BTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: BTBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.07 vs. BTBFX (4.81).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.00 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.02 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.749 | 9.763 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 560M | 11.1B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.99 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.81 | 10.07 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.65 | 38.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.20 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers