Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. BTBFX (526M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (2.65) vs BTBFX (1.27). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (31 years) vs FPCSX (6 years). FPCSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.78). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BTBFX (10.65). BTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: BTBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.94 vs. BTBFX (-1.41). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 24.02 vs. BTBFX (2.95).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.746 | 7.443 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 12.6B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.65 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.41 | 8.94 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.58 | 27.93 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 24.02 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.33 | N/A | - |