Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs FPCSX
BTBFX vs FPCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. FPCSX commentary
Aug 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and FPCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. BTBFX (531M). FPCSX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: FPCSX (2.59) vs BTBFX (1.23). BTBFX was incepted earlier than FPCSX: BTBFX (31 years) vs FPCSX (6 years). FPCSX (1.05) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.78). FPCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BTBFX (10.65). BTBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: BTBFX (100000) vs FPCSX (100000000). FPCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.07 vs. BTBFX (-0.29). FPCSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.20 vs. BTBFX (3.41).
| BTBFX | FPCSX | BTBFX / FPCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.99 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.05 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.563 | 8.677 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 12.8B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 2.59 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.29 | 9.07 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 34.49 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.41 | 25.20 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement