Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTBFX vs IFACX
BTBFX vs IFACX Comparison
Open Charts BTBFX vs IFACX
BTBFX vs IFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTBFX vs. IFACX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBFX is a Hold and IFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFACX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. BTBFX (526M). IFACX pays higher dividends than BTBFX: IFACX (2.84) vs BTBFX (1.27). BTBFX was incepted earlier than IFACX: BTBFX (31 years) vs IFACX (25 years). IFACX (1.31) is less costly to investors than BTBFX (0.78). IFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. BTBFX (10.65). IFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTBFX: IFACX (250) vs BTBFX (100000). IFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. BTBFX (-1.41). IFACX return over 5 years is better than : 21.18 vs. BTBFX (2.95).
| BTBFX | IFACX | BTBFX / IFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.31 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.31 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.746 | 7.987 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 526M | 145B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.84 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.41 | 7.61 | -18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.58 | 31.43 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.95 | 21.18 | 14% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.33 | 49.99 | 125% |