BTBT
Price
$1.64
Change
-$0.05 (-2.96%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
579.58M
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LGHL
Price
$0.24
Change
-$0.03 (-11.11%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
17.84M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTBT vs LGHL

BTBT vs LGHL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTBT vs. LGHL commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTBT is a Buy and LGHL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BTBT: $1.64 vs. LGHL: $0.24)
Brand notoriety: BTBT and LGHL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTBT: 77% vs. LGHL: 47%
Market capitalization -- BTBT: $579.58M vs. LGHL: $17.84M
BTBT [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $579.58M. LGHL’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $17.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLGHL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LGHL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTBT and LGHL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LGHL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • LGHL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LGHL is a better buy in the short-term than BTBT.

Price Growth

BTBT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -5.75% price change this week, while LGHL (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -27.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BTBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTBT($580M) has a higher market cap than LGHL($17.8M). BTBT YTD gains are higher at: -13.228 vs. LGHL (-98.427). LGHL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -343.19K vs. BTBT (-131.97M). BTBT has more cash in the bank: 83.6M vs. LGHL (20.1M). LGHL has less debt than BTBT: LGHL (18.3M) vs BTBT (364M). BTBT has higher revenues than LGHL: BTBT (116M) vs LGHL (833K).
BTBTLGHLBTBT / LGHL
Capitalization580M17.8M3,258%
EBITDA-131.97M-343.19K38,453%
Gain YTD-13.228-98.42713%
P/E Ratio1.98N/A-
Revenue116M833K13,926%
Total Cash83.6M20.1M416%
Total Debt364M18.3M1,989%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTBT vs LGHL: Fundamental Ratings
BTBT
LGHL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7345
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6099
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LGHL's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (70) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LGHL’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

LGHL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LGHL’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

LGHL's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as BTBT (99) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LGHL’s stock grew similarly to BTBT’s over the last 12 months.

BTBT's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LGHL (99) in the null industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LGHL’s over the last 12 months.

BTBT's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LGHL (100) in the null industry. This means that BTBT’s stock grew similarly to LGHL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTBTLGHL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
86%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LGHL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BOOT164.323.09
+1.92%
Boot Barn Holdings
SCSC53.860.78
+1.47%
ScanSource
MAMK13.00N/A
N/A
Maxsmaking Inc
NU13.67-0.09
-0.65%
Nu Holdings Ltd
PLUR1.63-0.11
-6.32%
Pluri

BTBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTBT has been closely correlated with MARA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTBT jumps, then MARA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTBT
1D Price
Change %
BTBT100%
-2.96%
MARA - BTBT
68%
Closely correlated
-3.25%
CLSK - BTBT
68%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
RIOT - BTBT
68%
Closely correlated
-3.70%
SBET - BTBT
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.63%
CIFR - BTBT
63%
Loosely correlated
-9.16%
More

LGHL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LGHL has been loosely correlated with NCPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LGHL jumps, then NCPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LGHL
1D Price
Change %
LGHL100%
-9.41%
NCPL - LGHL
33%
Loosely correlated
-2.78%
BTBT - LGHL
31%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
TOP - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
-12.80%
ABTS - LGHL
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.88%
ETOR - LGHL
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
More