BTC
Price
$34.23
Change
+$0.37 (+1.09%)
Updated
Nov 3, 03:55 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
5.08B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FBTC
Price
$67.42
Change
+$0.83 (+1.25%)
Updated
Nov 3, 03:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
14.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTC vs FBTC

BTC vs FBTC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) vs. Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC)

Key Takeaways

  • Both BTC and FBTC are spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning each holds actual Bitcoin rather than futures contracts, delivering direct exposure to the cryptocurrency's price.
  • Cost is a key differentiator: BTC carries a 0.15% expense ratio versus FBTC's 0.25%, making BTC one of the lowest-cost spot Bitcoin funds available.
  • Both funds are structured as grantor trusts with a single dominant holding (Bitcoin), so neither offers diversification across sectors or asset classes.
  • Custody differs structurally: FBTC's Bitcoin is held in-house by Fidelity Digital Assets, while BTC relies on third-party custodians such as Coinbase Custody Trust Company.
  • FBTC is significantly larger in assets under management (AUM, the total market value of assets the fund manages), which tends to support deeper trading liquidity and tighter execution.
  • Performance drivers are nearly identical; the primary separation between the two funds comes down to fees, scale, custody model, and sponsor brand.

Introduction

The launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in 2024 reshaped how investors access digital assets, bringing Bitcoin exposure into ordinary brokerage accounts without the complexity of private keys or cryptocurrency exchanges. Within this fast-growing category, BTC and FBTC are two of the most closely watched vehicles. Although they are direct competitors offering nearly identical underlying exposure, their differences in fee structure, scale, custody arrangement, and sponsor heritage create a meaningful ETF comparison for investors weighing total cost of ownership against liquidity and institutional infrastructure.

Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) Overview

The Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) is a passively managed spot Bitcoin fund launched on July 31, 2024. Its investment objective is to reflect the value of Bitcoin held by the trust, less expenses and other liabilities. The fund is benchmarked to the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index, which provides a real-time reference rate for the digital asset's U.S. dollar value.

Structurally, BTC is organized as a grantor trust rather than a conventional 1940 Act fund, and it holds a single position: Bitcoin, which represents 100% of the portfolio. There is no sector allocation in the traditional sense, as the entire portfolio is digital-asset exposure. The fund's custody is handled by third parties, primarily Coinbase Custody Trust Company, with Anchorage Digital Bank serving as an additional custodian.

The defining feature of BTC is its 0.15% management fee, which positions it among the lowest-cost spot Bitcoin funds in the market. This cost advantage is particularly relevant for long-term holders, because expense ratios compound over time and can materially erode returns.

Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) Overview

The Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) launched on January 10, 2024, as one of the first wave of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs. Like BTC, it is a passively managed grantor trust whose objective is to track the price of Bitcoin, less trust expenses and liabilities. FBTC uses the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate, calculated using a volume-weighted median price methodology across eligible Bitcoin spot markets.

FBTC's portfolio is essentially identical in composition: Bitcoin accounts for roughly 100% of net assets, with only a negligible cash allocation for operational purposes. As with BTC, there is no meaningful sector diversification, because the fund represents a single-asset, single-theme exposure.

FBTC carries a 0.25% expense ratio, modestly higher than BTC's fee. Its distinguishing structural characteristic is custody: all of the fund's Bitcoin is held by Fidelity Digital Asset Services, the firm's in-house custodian. This vertically integrated model is a differentiator for investors who place a premium on the custody infrastructure of a large, established asset manager. FBTC is also substantially larger in AUM than BTC, which historically supports deeper liquidity and narrower bid-ask spreads.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the digital-asset and cryptocurrency theme, which has matured considerably since the approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Institutional adoption has expanded, with Bitcoin increasingly treated as a distinct, scarce digital asset class and, in some investor narratives, a potential store of value or inflation hedge.

The sector remains highly sensitive to several catalysts. Regulatory clarity, including decisions around digital-asset custody and potential policy frameworks, continues to influence institutional capital flows. Macroeconomic drivers, particularly interest rate expectations and U.S. dollar strength, have historically correlated with Bitcoin's risk-asset behavior. Sector risks are substantial: Bitcoin exhibits high volatility, can experience deep drawdowns, and remains subject to evolving tax treatment and custody-security considerations. Both BTC and FBTC are fully exposed to these dynamics because they hold no offsets or hedges.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Because BTC and FBTC both track spot Bitcoin with minimal tracking difference, their fund performance and relative positioning have moved in near lockstep over recent weeks and recent market cycles. Neither fund provides a dividend yield, and neither applies leverage or hedging, so both experience the same direction and approximate magnitude of price swings.

The practical separation between the two vehicles is structural rather than return-driven. For cost-sensitive, long-horizon investors, BTC's lower expense ratio represents a marginal but compounding advantage. For investors prioritizing scale and trading efficiency, FBTC's larger AUM and deeper liquidity profile may translate into tighter execution in volatile conditions. FBTC's in-house custody may also appeal to those who favor a vertically integrated security model, while BTC's multi-custodian arrangement offers redundancy. In terms of volatility and drawdown risk, the two funds are effectively interchangeable, as both are single-asset exposures to the same underlying digital asset.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending instruments, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. For investors evaluating crypto-linked ETFs, the platform offers a data-driven way to surface candidates and compare signals across the digital-asset space.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor BTC for cost-conscious, long-horizon positioning, given its 0.15% expense ratio and the compounding benefit of lower fees over time. However, FBTC would likely hold the edge for investors prioritizing scale, trading liquidity, and institutional custody infrastructure, supported by its substantially larger AUM and in-house custodial model. Because both funds offer near-identical Bitcoin exposure and trend consistency, the AI's relative preference would be probabilistic and dependent on the weighting assigned to fees versus liquidity. Neither fund is a diversified or hedged vehicle, so the overriding risk driver remains Bitcoin's own volatility rather than any structural difference between the two ETFs.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BTC vs. FBTC commentary
Nov 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTC is a Hold and FBTC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for BTC with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

BTC in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026

BTC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 11 of 11 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BTC as a result. In 36 of 45 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 80%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BTC turned negative on September 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 15 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 13 of the 15 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 87%.

The 10-day moving average for BTC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 5 of 5 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BTC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for BTC entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.

Following a +2.10% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BTC advanced for three days, in 114 of 126 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

BTC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for FBTC with price predictions
Nov 02, 2026

FBTC in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026

FBTC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 21 of 22 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FBTC as a result. In 46 of 56 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FBTC turned negative on September 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 19 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 16 of the 19 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 84%.

The 10-day moving average for FBTC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 7 of 8 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FBTC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Aroon Indicator for FBTC entered a downward trend on November 02, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

Following a +2.03% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FBTC advanced for three days, in 142 of 155 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

FBTC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTCFBTC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
BTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FBTC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSMC45.610.37
+0.83%
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC)
VEM26.64N/A
N/A
Virtus Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (VEM)
BSCS20.19-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco BulletShares 2028 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCS)
AAEQ53.62-0.38
-0.71%
Alpha Architect US Equity 2 ETF (AAEQ)
JNEU33.11-0.48
-1.43%
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped June ETF (JNEU)