Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTIRX vs FWMMX
BTIRX vs FWMMX Comparison
Open Charts BTIRX vs FWMMX
BTIRX vs FWMMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWMMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. BTIRX (431M). FWMMX pays higher dividends than BTIRX: FWMMX (1.41) vs BTIRX (0.97). BTIRX was incepted earlier than FWMMX: BTIRX (9 years) vs FWMMX (6 years). FWMMX (0.35) is less costly to investors than BTIRX (0.23). FWMMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. BTIRX (2.00). BTIRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWMMX: BTIRX (0) vs FWMMX (250). FWMMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.72 vs. BTIRX (5.29). FWMMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.58 vs. BTIRX (-15.56).
| BTIRX | FWMMX | BTIRX / FWMMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.35 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.23 | 0.35 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.317 | 3.822 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 219B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.97 | 1.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 5.72 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.55 | 29.02 | 5% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.56 | 30.58 | -51% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement