Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMFX vs FSMAX
BTMFX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BTMFX vs FSMAX
BTMFX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMFX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMFX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. BTMFX (165M). BTMFX pays higher dividends than FSMAX: BTMFX (0.70) vs FSMAX (0.50). BTMFX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BTMFX (19 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BTMFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BTMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.70 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMFX: FSMAX (0) vs BTMFX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. BTMFX (-2.14). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. BTMFX (3.29).
| BTMFX | FSMAX | BTMFX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.04 | 2,800% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.049 | 15.556 | 13% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 165M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 0.50 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.14 | 30.47 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.43 | 74.03 | 13% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.29 | 35.19 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.12 | 153.75 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers