Ad is loading...
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$16.57
Change+$0.05 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.81B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$15.16
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.22B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Hold and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. BTMKX (10.8B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.18) vs FSGEX (2.81). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX (7.81) and BTMKX (7.45) have marching annual gain over last year. BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 87.65 vs. FSGEX (77.05).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.513 | 6.629 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 52.2B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.81 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.45 | 7.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.63 | 15.42 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.65 | 77.05 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.69 | 52.93 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers