Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.03
Change-$0.26 (-1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.86B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$16.47
Change-$0.21 (-1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.74B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Hold and FSGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 53.7B vs. BTMKX (11.9B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (2.92) vs FSGEX (2.61). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX (15.59) and BTMKX (15.11) have marching annual gain over last year. BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 69.68 vs. FSGEX (60.60).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.075 | 16.149 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.9B | 53.7B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 2.61 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.11 | 15.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.14 | 45.15 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.68 | 60.60 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.41 | 66.17 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers