Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.66
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.32B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$17.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets56B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and FSGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 56B vs. BTMKX (12.3B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (2.85) vs FSGEX (2.51). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX (20.36) and BTMKX (19.65) have marching annual gain over last year. BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 67.61 vs. FSGEX (57.89).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.200 | 20.945 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.3B | 56B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 2.51 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.65 | 20.36 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.32 | 50.66 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.61 | 57.89 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.20 | 77.92 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement