Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.80
Change+$0.15 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.51B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$17.45
Change+$0.11 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets58.95B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 59B vs. BTMKX (12.5B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (2.57) vs FSGEX (2.44). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. BTMKX (16.14). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 65.90 vs. FSGEX (55.61).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.117 | 22.285 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.5B | 59B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 2.44 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 18.07 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.65 | 57.80 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 65.90 | 55.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.90 | 95.82 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers