Ad is loading...
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$15.25
Change-$0.37 (-2.37%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$14.17
Change-$0.32 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Hold and FSGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. BTMKX (10.5B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.01) vs FSGEX (2.77). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (15 years). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSGEX (6.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.43 vs. BTMKX (8.72). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 30.40 vs. FSGEX (25.86).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.080 | 7.642 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.5B | 49.3B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.01 | 2.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | 10.43 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.31 | 7.52 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.40 | 25.86 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.98 | 54.02 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...