Ad is loading...
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$16.97
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.11B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$15.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.22B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and FSGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. BTMKX (11.1B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.18) vs FSGEX (2.81). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). BTMKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.22 vs. FSGEX (11.61). BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 77.70 vs. FSGEX (66.64).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.133 | 8.322 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.1B | 52.2B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.18 | 2.81 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.22 | 11.61 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.57 | 28.11 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 77.70 | 66.64 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.11 | 47.95 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers