Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
iShares MSCI EAFE Intl Idx K
Price$18.95
Change+$0.10 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.55B
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$17.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets55.93B
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a StrongBuy and FSGEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 55.9B vs. BTMKX (12.6B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (2.69) vs FSGEX (2.54). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (14 years) vs FSGEX (16 years). BTMKX (0.05) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX (19.75) and BTMKX (19.28) have marching annual gain over last year. BTMKX return over 5 years is better than : 66.20 vs. FSGEX (55.90).
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.01 | 500% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.100 | 22.708 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 55.9B | 23% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 2.54 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | 19.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.26 | 45.91 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 66.20 | 55.90 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.92 | 83.66 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement