Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 77B vs. BTMKX (14.2B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.29) vs FSGEX (2.58). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (15 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). BTMKX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX (8.00) and FSGEX (8.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.49 vs. BTMKX (17.27). FSGEX (55.03) and BTMKX (54.26) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.023 | 15.683 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.2B | 77B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 2.58 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.27 | 22.49 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.01 | 73.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.26 | 55.03 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 143.79 | 137.13 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers