Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a StrongBuy and FSGEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. BTMKX (14B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.42) vs FSGEX (2.64). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (15 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). BTMKX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.37 vs. BTMKX (21.09). FSGEX (53.10) and BTMKX (52.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.288 | 14.973 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 74.3B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.64 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.09 | 32.37 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.47 | 72.19 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.90 | 53.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 139.25 | 141.45 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement