Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a StrongBuy and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.9B vs. BTMKX (14B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.40) vs FSGEX (2.63). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (15 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). BTMKX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.06 vs. BTMKX (21.46). BTMKX (55.11) and FSGEX (53.66) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.526 | 14.153 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 74.9B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 2.63 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.46 | 28.06 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.30 | 64.20 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.11 | 53.66 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 144.25 | 137.49 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement