Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison
Open Charts BTMKX vs FSGEX
BTMKX vs FSGEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMKX vs. FSGEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMKX is a Buy and FSGEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 74.3B vs. BTMKX (14B). BTMKX pays higher dividends than FSGEX: BTMKX (3.42) vs FSGEX (2.64). BTMKX was incepted earlier than FSGEX: BTMKX (15 years) vs FSGEX (17 years). BTMKX (0.04) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). BTMKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. FSGEX (8.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMKX: FSGEX (0) vs BTMKX (5000000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.74 vs. BTMKX (25.47). BTMKX (56.59) and FSGEX (56.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BTMKX | FSGEX | BTMKX / FSGEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.01 | 400% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.681 | 16.175 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 74.3B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.42 | 2.64 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.47 | 34.74 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.85 | 74.26 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.59 | 56.38 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 159.03 | 157.31 | 101% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers