Advertisement
BTOW vs CHKP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTOW is a Hold and CHKP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCHKP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- BTOW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CHKP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CHKP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BTOW (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CHKP (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+3.07% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| BTOW | CHKP | BTOW / CHKP | |
| Capitalization | 109K | 19.2B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -920.72K | 939M | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 24.000 | 15.838 | 152% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.14 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 2.39B | - |
| Total Cash | 176K | 1.46B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 1.05M | N/A | - |
BTOW | CHKP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTOW's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHKP (72) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BTOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (89) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (32) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
BTOW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CHKP (50) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that BTOW’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CHKP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
BTOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTOW and AKAFF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTOW and AKAFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTOW | 100% | N/A | ||
| AKAFF - BTOW | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHKP - BTOW | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| WPNDF - BTOW | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PANW - BTOW | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| CINGF - BTOW | 6% Poorly correlated | -4.23% | ||
More | ||||
CHKP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHKP has been loosely correlated with DOX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHKP jumps, then DOX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHKP | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| DOX - CHKP | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| PANW - CHKP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| EEFT - CHKP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ADSK - CHKP | 38% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| GEN - CHKP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
More | ||||