Ad is loading...
BTSDF
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
LSF
Price
$8.69
Change
-$0.08 (-0.91%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
107 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BTSDF vs LSF

Header iconBTSDF vs LSF Comparison
Open Charts BTSDF vs LSFBanner chart's image
Health & Happiness International Holdings
Price$1.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$195
CapitalizationN/A
Laird Superfood
Price$8.69
Change-$0.08 (-0.91%)
Volume$125.28K
CapitalizationN/A
BTSDF vs LSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSDF vs. LSF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSDF is a Hold and LSF is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BTSDF: $1.30 vs. LSF: $8.69)
Brand notoriety: BTSDF and LSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSDF: 98% vs. LSF: 85%
Market capitalization -- BTSDF: $844.49M vs. LSF: $24.95M
BTSDF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $844.49M. LSF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $24.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BTSDF is a better buy in the long-term than LSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BTSDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LSF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -5.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

LSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTSDF($844M) has a higher market cap than LSF($24.9M). LSF YTD gains are higher at: 854.945 vs. BTSDF (11.588). BTSDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.56B vs. LSF (-10.39M). BTSDF has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. LSF (7.57M). LSF has less debt than BTSDF: LSF (383K) vs BTSDF (9.45B). BTSDF has higher revenues than LSF: BTSDF (12.1B) vs LSF (34.2M).
BTSDFLSFBTSDF / LSF
Capitalization844M24.9M3,390%
EBITDA1.56B-10.39M-15,039%
Gain YTD11.588854.9451%
P/E Ratio9.74N/A-
Revenue12.1B34.2M35,380%
Total Cash2.11B7.57M27,914%
Total Debt9.45B383K2,466,580%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTSDF: Fundamental Ratings
BTSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLQVX22.39-0.13
-0.58%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value I
NSOPX18.09-0.14
-0.77%
North Star Opportunity A
EIVAX14.82-0.12
-0.80%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value A
CSGIX9.75-0.12
-1.22%
Calamos International Small Cap Gr I
ADCVX29.79-0.67
-2.20%
American Century Disciplined Growth A

BTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSDF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSDF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSDF
1D Price
Change %
BTSDF100%
N/A
LSF - BTSDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
ATPC - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
WWNTY - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSF and FAMI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSF and FAMI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSF
1D Price
Change %
LSF100%
-0.91%
FAMI - LSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
NATR - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KIKOF - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRPT - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
PETZ - LSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
More