Ad is loading...
BTSDF
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
MGAAF
Price
$15.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 11 closing price
Ad is loading...

BTSDF vs MGAAF

Header iconBTSDF vs MGAAF Comparison
Open Charts BTSDF vs MGAAFBanner chart's image
Health & Happiness International Holdings
Price$1.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$195
CapitalizationN/A
Morinaga & Co
Price$15.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
BTSDF vs MGAAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSDF vs. MGAAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSDF is a Hold and MGAAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BTSDF: $1.30 vs. MGAAF: $15.51)
Brand notoriety: BTSDF and MGAAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSDF: 98% vs. MGAAF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTSDF: $844.49M vs. MGAAF: $1.5B
BTSDF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $844.49M. MGAAF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGAAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTSDF and MGAAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BTSDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MGAAF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGAAF($1.5B) has a higher market cap than BTSDF($844M). MGAAF has higher P/E ratio than BTSDF: MGAAF (20.92) vs BTSDF (9.74). BTSDF YTD gains are higher at: 11.588 vs. MGAAF (-50.000). MGAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 34.4B vs. BTSDF (1.56B). MGAAF has more cash in the bank: 46.7B vs. BTSDF (2.11B). BTSDF has less debt than MGAAF: BTSDF (9.45B) vs MGAAF (19B). MGAAF has higher revenues than BTSDF: MGAAF (190B) vs BTSDF (12.1B).
BTSDFMGAAFBTSDF / MGAAF
Capitalization844M1.5B56%
EBITDA1.56B34.4B5%
Gain YTD11.588-50.000-23%
P/E Ratio9.7420.9247%
Revenue12.1B190B6%
Total Cash2.11B46.7B5%
Total Debt9.45B19B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTSDF: Fundamental Ratings
BTSDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
75
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLVMX22.52-0.13
-0.57%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R6
EIVCX14.27-0.11
-0.76%
Allspring Special Large Cap Value C
CAISX9.70-0.11
-1.12%
Calamos International Small Cap Gr A
CGEOX19.02-0.30
-1.55%
Calamos Global Equity R6
ADRRX28.31-0.63
-2.18%
American Century Disciplined Growth R

BTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSDF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSDF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSDF
1D Price
Change %
BTSDF100%
N/A
LSF - BTSDF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
ATPC - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
WWNTY - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGAAF and TUFBY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGAAF and TUFBY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGAAF
1D Price
Change %
MGAAF100%
N/A
TUFBY - MGAAF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIF - MGAAF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLMIY - MGAAF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
LSF - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
BTSDF - MGAAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More