Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFBX vs RMFCX
BUFBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BUFBX vs RMFCX
BUFBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFBX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BUFBX (506M). BUFBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: BUFBX (1.44) vs RMFCX (1.15). BUFBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BUFBX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). BUFBX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BUFBX (0.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFBX: RMFCX (250) vs BUFBX (2500). BUFBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.53 vs. RMFCX (9.14). BUFBX return over 5 years is better than : 49.88 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| BUFBX | RMFCX | BUFBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.971 | 10.454 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 1.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.53 | 9.14 | 181% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.18 | 38.82 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.88 | 36.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.84 | 92.27 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement