Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFBX vs RMFCX
BUFBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BUFBX vs RMFCX
BUFBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFBX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. BUFBX (461M). BUFBX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: BUFBX (1.41) vs RMFCX (1.19). BUFBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BUFBX (32 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). BUFBX (1.00) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BUFBX (0.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFBX: RMFCX (250) vs BUFBX (2500). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. BUFBX (6.49). BUFBX (38.56) and RMFCX (38.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| BUFBX | RMFCX | BUFBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.043 | 6.676 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 1.19 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.49 | 10.38 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.25 | 29.22 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.56 | 38.29 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.63 | 93.62 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement