Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFMX vs FSMAX
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BUFMX vs FSMAX
Buffalo Mid Cap Growth
Price$16.73
Change-$0.15 (-0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets140.99M
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.88
Change-$0.07 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. BUFMX (141M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BUFMX: FSMAX (0.46) vs BUFMX (0.00). BUFMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BUFMX (24 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). BUFMX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BUFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFMX: FSMAX (0) vs BUFMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. BUFMX (6.36). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.34 vs. BUFMX (-1.75).
| BUFMX | FSMAX | BUFMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.04 | 2,771% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.495 | 4.478 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 141M | 39.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.36 | 21.74 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.03 | 37.63 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.75 | 51.34 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.39 | 81.66 | -14% |