Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFMX vs FSMAX
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BUFMX vs FSMAX
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. BUFMX (101M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BUFMX: FSMAX (0.49) vs BUFMX (0.00). BUFMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BUFMX (25 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BUFMX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). BUFMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFMX: FSMAX (0) vs BUFMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.05 vs. BUFMX (-21.16). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. BUFMX (-37.07).
| BUFMX | FSMAX | BUFMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.04 | 2,943% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.04 | 2,943% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.529 | 13.370 | -49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 40.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -21.16 | 13.05 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | -13.27 | 63.92 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -37.07 | 32.77 | -113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.03 | 133.42 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers