Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFMX vs FSMAX
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts BUFMX vs FSMAX
BUFMX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFMX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFMX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. BUFMX (111M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than BUFMX: FSMAX (0.50) vs BUFMX (0.00). BUFMX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: BUFMX (25 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). BUFMX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. BUFMX (13.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFMX: FSMAX (0) vs BUFMX (2500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.23 vs. BUFMX (-13.83). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. BUFMX (-32.69).
| BUFMX | FSMAX | BUFMX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.04 | 2,886% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.04 | 2,886% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.512 | 15.427 | -10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111M | 42.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.83 | 29.23 | -47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.01 | 73.83 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.69 | 33.65 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.98 | 153.47 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers