BULZ
Price
$39.23
Change
+$2.53 (+6.89%)
Updated
Sep 3, 03:14 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.07B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$90.38
Change
+$2.07 (+2.34%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BULZ vs QLD

BULZ vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • BULZ seeks 3x daily returns of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index, an equal-weighted basket focused on large-cap technology names, while QLD targets 2x daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index, offering broader large-cap growth exposure.
  • BULZ is structured as an exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by Bank of Montreal with a 0.95% expense ratio and no underlying holdings, whereas QLD is an open-end exchange-traded fund (ETF) sponsored by ProShares with a 0.95% net expense ratio and synthetic exposure via derivatives.
  • BULZ concentrates on 15 stocks with eight fixed core components (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla) plus seven rotating selections, resulting in higher concentration risk compared to QLD’s diversified exposure across approximately 100 Nasdaq-100 constituents.
  • Both products employ daily-reset leverage, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term buy-and-hold strategies due to compounding effects and potential volatility decay.
  • QLD provides greater liquidity and assets under management (AUM) scale, while BULZ offers amplified exposure to a narrower thematic technology segment with monthly index rebalancing.
  • Expense ratios are identical at 0.95%, but structural differences in leverage multiple, index breadth, and product type (ETN versus ETF) drive distinct risk-return profiles and tracking characteristics.

Introduction

Investors seeking leveraged exposure to U.S. technology and growth equities often evaluate products such as BULZ and QLD. These exchange-traded vehicles do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they represent differentiated strategies targeting overlapping investor objectives within the technology sector. BULZ delivers magnified daily returns on a concentrated FANG-plus-innovation basket, while QLD provides leveraged access to the broader Nasdaq-100 Index. Comparing the two highlights differences in leverage intensity, diversification, fund structure, and thematic focus that matter for portfolio positioning in the current market environment.

MicroSectors FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) Overview

BULZ is a 3x leveraged exchange-traded note (ETN) issued by Bank of Montreal that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to three times the daily performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. The index comprises 15 large-capitalization U.S. technology stocks, including eight permanent core components—Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla—plus seven additional names selected through a rules-based methodology and equally weighted. The index rebalances monthly and reconstitutes quarterly. As an ETN, BULZ carries issuer credit risk rather than holding underlying securities. The expense ratio is 0.95%. The product resets leverage daily and is designed for short-term trading applications.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD is a 2x leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) sponsored by ProShares that seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to two times the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The underlying index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, providing broad exposure to technology, consumer discretionary, communication services, and healthcare sectors. The fund achieves its leveraged exposure through a combination of swaps, futures, and other derivatives rather than direct stock ownership. The net expense ratio is 0.95%. QLD distributes dividends quarterly and maintains significantly larger assets under management and trading volume than more specialized leveraged products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to dominate U.S. equity market leadership amid ongoing innovation cycles in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, semiconductors, and digital advertising. Macroeconomic factors such as interest-rate expectations, corporate earnings growth among mega-cap technology firms, and capital-allocation trends influence flows into leveraged technology products. Regulatory developments around antitrust scrutiny and data privacy remain relevant risks, while sector rotation between growth and value styles can affect relative performance of concentrated versus broad technology benchmarks. Capital continues to flow toward large-cap technology names, supporting thematic strategies focused on innovation leaders.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited amplified volatility consistent with their leverage multiples and underlying index characteristics. BULZ’s narrower focus on a concentrated set of innovation leaders has produced sharper moves during technology rallies and pullbacks compared with QLD’s broader Nasdaq-100 exposure. Sector rotation favoring or disfavoring mega-cap technology stocks, combined with earnings momentum from top holdings, has driven relative performance differentials. The higher leverage in BULZ magnifies both gains and losses, while QLD’s 2x multiple and greater diversification moderate daily swings relative to the 3x product. Interest-rate sensitivity and growth expectations continue to influence positioning in both vehicles over multi-week and multi-month horizons.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic preference to QLD. The lower leverage multiple, broader diversification across the Nasdaq-100 Index, larger scale, and ETF structure contribute to a comparatively favorable risk-adjusted profile and trend consistency in the prevailing market environment, while still providing meaningful amplified exposure to technology growth themes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BULZ vs. QLD commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BULZ is a Buy and QLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.8B vs. BULZ (3.07B). BULZ has a higher annual dividend yield than QLD: BULZ (41.399) vs QLD (25.533). BULZ was incepted earlier than QLD: BULZ (5 years) vs QLD (20 years). BULZ (0.95) and QLD (0.95) have comparable expense ratios .
BULZQLDBULZ / QLD
Gain YTD41.39925.533162%
Net Assets3.07B13.8B22%
Total Expense Ratio0.950.95100%
TurnoverN/A16.00-
Yield0.000.13-
Fund Existence5 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BULZQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BULZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMOT40.520.44
+1.10%
VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF
BCAT15.900.10
+0.63%
BlackRock Capital Allocation Term Trust
JUNP32.260.12
+0.36%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Jun
TUSB50.410.01
+0.03%
Thrivent Ultra Short Bond ETF
HIBS20.24-0.46
-2.22%
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Hi Bt Br 3X ETF