Advertisement
BUSE vs CLBK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CLBK is a Buy.
BUSE | CLBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 15 | 31 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BUSE's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLBK (89) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (59) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (31) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLBK’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.
BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
| BUSE | CLBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 54% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while CLBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CLBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BUSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BUSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CLBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.80% price change this week, while CLBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
CLBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AFRU | 8.71 | 0.25 | +2.96% |
| T-REX 2X Long AFRM Daily Target ETF (AFRU) | |||
| CGSM | 25.78 | 0.07 | +0.27% |
| Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF (CGSM) | |||
| EDOG | 23.62 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
| ALPS Emerging Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (EDOG) | |||
| CHIQ | 15.71 | -0.06 | -0.38% |
| Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) | |||
| GREK | 83.89 | -1.81 | -2.11% |
| Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) | |||
BUSE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with EFSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then EFSC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUSE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUSE | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| EFSC - BUSE | 85% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| BY - BUSE | 85% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| FULT - BUSE | 85% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| SHBI - BUSE | 85% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| CVBF - BUSE | 85% Closely correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||
CLBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLBK has been closely correlated with PGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLBK jumps, then PGC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLBK | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| PGC - CLBK | 67% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| BUSE - CLBK | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| MPB - CLBK | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| QCRH - CLBK | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| CNOB - CLBK | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.97% | ||
More | ||||