Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$44.60
Change+$0.56 (+1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.78M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$100.24
Change+$1.80 (+1.83%)
Volume$100
Net Assets1.08B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.08B vs. BUYZ (8.78M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (24.316) vs BUYZ (19.316). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 19.316 | 24.316 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 8.78M | 1.08B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 999% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.16% | ||
| GTM - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.44% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.09% | ||
| JD - BUYZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -0.49% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | -2.11% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| APH - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -4.42% | ||
More | ||||