Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Volume$866
Net Assets8.6M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$93.70
Change+$0.64 (+0.69%)
Volume$94.47K
Net Assets951.67M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 952M vs. BUYZ (8.6M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (18.330) vs BUYZ (16.378). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 16.378 | 18.330 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 8.6M | 952M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 999% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.61% | ||
| LQDT - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MMYT - BUYZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 84% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| APH - FWD | 81% Closely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +5.32% | ||
More | ||||