Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.99
Change+$0.34 (+0.86%)
Volume$100
Net Assets7.92M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$83.94
Change+$0.72 (+0.87%)
Volume$100
Net Assets699.85M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 700M vs. BUYZ (7.92M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: BUYZ (7.435) vs FWD (5.089). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 7.435 | 5.089 | 146% |
| Net Assets | 7.92M | 700M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 163.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
More | ||||