Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$37.78
Change+$0.36 (+0.96%)
Volume$194
Net Assets17.01M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$83.11
Change+$0.43 (+0.52%)
Volume$79.49K
Net Assets553.44M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 553M vs. BUYZ (17M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (4.950) vs BUYZ (2.343). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (47.01) vs BUYZ (47.01).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 2.343 | 4.950 | 47% |
| Net Assets | 17M | 553M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 47.01 | 90.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 0.00 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 87% | 12 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 80% | 12 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.96% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -5.31% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| VCSA - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ZI - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.79% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +2.99% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +4.89% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||