Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$35.14
Change+$0.54 (+1.56%)
Volume$1.09K
Net Assets10.38M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$67.45
Change-$4.28 (-5.97%)
Volume$1.18K
Net Assets542.17M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 542M vs. BUYZ (10.4M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: BUYZ (-4.795) vs FWD (-9.420). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | -4.795 | -9.420 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 10.4M | 542M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 163.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.58% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| VCSA - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
| ZI - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.30% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
More | ||||