Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.44
Change+$0.45 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.41M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$104.36
Change+$3.41 (+3.38%)
Volume$500
Net Assets1.15B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Oct 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.15B vs. BUYZ (8.41M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (27.486) vs BUYZ (13.772). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 13.772 | 27.486 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 8.41M | 1.15B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,052% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -4.34% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -4.89% | ||
| APH - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -6.35% | ||
More | ||||