Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.62
Change+$1.06 (+2.75%)
Volume$556
Net Assets7.85M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$103.29
Change+$1.25 (+1.23%)
Volume$171.47K
Net Assets1.26B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.26B vs. BUYZ (7.85M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (30.441) vs BUYZ (7.331). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 7.331 | 30.441 | 24% |
| Net Assets | 7.85M | 1.26B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,173% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +2.75% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| U - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| META - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ETSY - BUYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.33% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y