Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets8.4M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$93.34
Change-$0.16 (-0.17%)
Volume$40.84K
Net Assets918.96M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 919M vs. BUYZ (8.4M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (17.876) vs BUYZ (14.258). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 14.258 | 17.876 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 8.4M | 919M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,016% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 1 day ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y