Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.12
Change+$0.10 (+0.25%)
Volume$288
Net Assets8.08M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$89.56
Change+$0.54 (+0.61%)
Volume$200
Net Assets764.24M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 764M vs. BUYZ (8.08M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (12.426) vs BUYZ (8.702). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 8.702 | 12.426 | 70% |
| Net Assets | 8.08M | 764M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 66% Loosely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +4.93% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.42% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +4.62% | ||
More | ||||