Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$34.65
Change+$0.42 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$71.86
Change+$2.68 (+3.87%)
Volume$20.2K
Net Assets564.78M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 565M vs. BUYZ (6.84M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FWD: BUYZ (-7.261) vs FWD (-9.256). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | -7.261 | -9.256 | 78% |
| Net Assets | 6.84M | 565M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 163.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| FICO - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GDDY - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +3.87% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +6.86% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +4.92% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +6.25% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +6.53% | ||
More | ||||