Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs PCGG
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs PCGG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Volume$866
Net Assets8.6M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$12.15
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
Volume$36.63K
Net Assets187.74M
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. PCGG commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and PCGG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 188M vs. BUYZ (8.6M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: BUYZ (16.378) vs PCGG (3.187). BUYZ was incepted earlier than PCGG: BUYZ (6 years) vs PCGG (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| BUYZ | PCGG | BUYZ / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 16.378 | 3.187 | 514% |
| Net Assets | 8.6M | 188M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 17.61 | 216% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.61% | ||
| LQDT - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MMYT - BUYZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| V - PCGG | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.10% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| ZTS - PCGG | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 8% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
More | ||||