Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$37.48
Change-$1.59 (-4.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$28.53
Change-$0.94 (-3.19%)
Volume$557
CapitalizationN/A
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 405M vs. BUYZ (17.6M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (35.668) vs TMFG (20.084). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (5 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ has a higher turnover TMFG (4.00) vs TMFG (4.00).
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 35.668 | 20.084 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 17.6M | 405M | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 47.01 | 4.00 | 1,175% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.33 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 90% | 15 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| VCSA - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -5.25% | ||
| ZI - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +2.75% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | -0.25% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.50% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| EQIX - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||