Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$34.65
Change+$0.42 (+1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.84M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$28.16
Change+$0.59 (+2.14%)
Volume$10.2K
Net Assets375.76M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and TMFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 376M vs. BUYZ (6.84M). TMFG has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: TMFG (-0.618) vs BUYZ (-7.261). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (5 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). TMFG has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | -7.261 | -0.618 | 1,175% |
| Net Assets | 6.84M | 376M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 38.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.38 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TMFG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.04% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| FICO - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| GDDY - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +2.14% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.64% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.76% | ||
| SNEX - TMFG | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.50% | ||
More | ||||