Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.96
Change-$0.07 (-0.16%)
Volume$866
Net Assets8.6M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$30.73
Change+$0.09 (+0.29%)
Volume$21.32K
Net Assets402.71M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and TMFG is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 403M vs. BUYZ (8.6M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (16.378) vs TMFG (8.489). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (6 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). BUYZ (38.02) and TMFG (38.00) have matching turnover.
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 16.378 | 8.489 | 193% |
| Net Assets | 8.6M | 403M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 38.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.35 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.18% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +5.61% | ||
| LQDT - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| MMYT - BUYZ | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| MA - TMFG | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| CRM - TMFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| AMZN - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||