Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.99
Change+$0.34 (+0.86%)
Volume$100
Net Assets7.92M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$29.84
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
Volume$452
Net Assets401.46M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 401M vs. BUYZ (7.92M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (7.435) vs TMFG (5.082). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (5 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). TMFG has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 7.435 | 5.082 | 146% |
| Net Assets | 7.92M | 401M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 38.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.35 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| TMFG | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.22% | ||
| ACVA - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.54% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 61% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| SNEX - TMFG | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.43% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
More | ||||