Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.35
Change+$0.56 (+1.41%)
Volume$1.24K
Net Assets7.95M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$29.98
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.8M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Dec 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and TMFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 378M vs. BUYZ (7.95M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (9.314) vs TMFG (5.877). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (6 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). BUYZ (38.02) and TMFG (38.00) have matching turnover.
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 9.314 | 5.877 | 158% |
| Net Assets | 7.95M | 378M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 38.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.35 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.41% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.83% | ||
| U - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.97% | ||
| META - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| GPK - BUYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| MA - TMFG | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| AMZN - TMFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CRM - TMFG | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More | ||||