Advertisement
BWA vs IP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a StrongBuy and IP is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BWA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BWA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BWA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.38% price change this week, while IP (@Containers/Packaging) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.18%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.56%.
Reported Earning Dates
BWA is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
IP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.92% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
@Containers/Packaging (+0.26% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| BWA | IP | BWA / IP | |
| Capitalization | 8.09B | 13.5B | 60% |
| EBITDA | 1.65B | 2.24B | 74% |
| Gain YTD | 4.760 | -11.888 | -40% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.98 | 45.38 | 29% |
| Revenue | 14.2B | 18.9B | 75% |
| Total Cash | 1.53B | 1.11B | 138% |
| Total Debt | 3.93B | 5.91B | 67% |
BWA | IP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 83 | 86 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IP's Valuation (29) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as BWA (45) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that IP’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.
IP's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Containers Or Packaging industry is in the same range as BWA (63) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that IP’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's SMR Rating (83) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as IP (86) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as IP (62) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to IP’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is significantly better than the same rating for IP (95) in the Containers Or Packaging industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew significantly faster than IP’s over the last 12 months.
| BWA | IP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 62% | 8 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JASMY.X | 0.013262 | 0.000102 | +0.78% |
| JasmyCoin cryptocurrency | |||
| GHTA | 30.33 | 0.17 | +0.56% |
| Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF | |||
| ENJ.X | 0.068106 | -0.000502 | -0.73% |
| Enjin Coin cryptocurrency | |||
| JUV.X | 1.038414 | -0.022701 | -2.14% |
| Juventus Fan Token cryptocurrency | |||
| FUN.X | 0.003306 | -0.000202 | -5.75% |
| FUNToken cryptocurrency | |||
BWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWA | 100% | -0.93% | ||
| LEA - BWA | 78% Closely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| ALV - BWA | 74% Closely correlated | -1.28% | ||
| VC - BWA | 74% Closely correlated | -3.32% | ||
| THRM - BWA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| GNTX - BWA | 72% Closely correlated | -2.49% | ||
More | ||||