Advertisement
ALV vs BWA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Autoliv Inc. (ALV) vs. BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BorgWarner (BWA) has significantly outperformed Autoliv (ALV) year-to-date, with a 24% gain compared to ALV's 3%, driven by strong momentum in electric vehicle (EV) components.
- ALV offers a more attractive valuation with a forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 6.01 versus BWA's 13.79, alongside a higher dividend yield of 2.71%.
- Recent earnings for ALV beat expectations with 6.8% year-over-year sales growth and an 8.6% operating margin, boosting sentiment in recent weeks.
- BWA benefits from analyst upgrades and positive EV sector exposure, with year-to-date returns outpacing auto peers.
- Both stocks face cyclical auto sector risks, but BWA's lower beta of 1.03 indicates relatively less volatility than ALV's 1.36.
- ALV's return on equity (ROE) stands at 28.37%, reflecting efficient capital use amid recent operational improvements.
Introduction
Autoliv Inc. (ALV) and BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) are key players in the automotive supply chain, with ALV focusing on passive safety systems like airbags and seatbelts, and BWA specializing in powertrain technologies for hybrid and electric vehicles. This stock comparison is relevant for investors tracking the auto sector's shift toward electrification and safety innovations. Traders seeking relative performance insights, valuation trade-offs, and momentum signals in recent market activity will find value here, especially amid evolving global vehicle production trends.
ALV Overview and Recent Performance
Autoliv Inc. (ALV) is a leading developer and manufacturer of passive safety systems for the automotive industry worldwide, including airbags, seatbelts, and steering wheels. In recent market activity, ALV shares have traded near their 52-week high of $130.14, with a current price around $121 and a market capitalization of approximately $9 billion. The stock has gained about 44% over the past year but remains up modestly year-to-date at 3%. Sentiment has improved following a strong quarterly earnings report, where net sales rose 6.8% year-over-year to $2.75 billion, driven by robust March performance and operational efficiencies, achieving an 8.6% operating margin. Analysts have responded positively, with price target increases reflecting confidence in ongoing demand for safety features amid regulatory pressures and consumer preferences.
BWA Overview and Recent Performance
BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) provides advanced technology solutions for combustion, hybrid, and electric vehicles, including turbochargers, eTurbos, battery systems, and power electronics across segments like Turbos & Thermal Technologies and PowerDrive Systems. Shares recently traded around $56 with a market cap of $11.5 billion, within a 52-week range of $26 to $70. The stock has delivered impressive gains, up 24% year-to-date and over 113% in the past year, outperforming auto peers. Recent weeks have seen sustained momentum from analyst upgrades, such as UBS raising its price target to $56, amid favorable EV transition dynamics and strategic positioning in electrification. Positive sentiment stems from the company's exposure to high-growth areas like battery management and inverters, supporting relative strength in volatile market conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse AI/ML strategies, including swing trading dips, trend-following in small caps and penny stocks, and sector-specific plays in semiconductors, gold miners, finance, and aerospace. Performance stats are compelling: annualized returns range from 15.5% to 167.8%, win rates from 53.9% to 87.7%, profit factors up to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 22.1. Timeframes vary from 5 minutes to 55 days, with many featuring risk management like take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Traders can explore these real-time signal providers to align with current market conditions—visit the page to discover bots suited to your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ALV and BWA both serve the automotive sector but differ in focus: ALV's stable business model centers on essential passive safety components with consistent demand, while BWA emphasizes growth-oriented EV powertrain solutions like eMotors and inverters, positioning it for electrification tailwinds. Recent momentum favors BWA with superior year-to-date and one-year returns, contrasting ALV's steadier but lower gains post-earnings. Valuation trade-offs highlight ALV's cheaper forward P/E and higher dividend yield versus BWA's premium pricing on growth prospects. Risk factors include auto production cyclicality and supply chain issues for both, though BWA's lower beta suggests better stability. Sector exposure aligns them with global vehicle trends, but BWA benefits more from EV adoption. Market sentiment leans positive for BWA via analyst upgrades, while ALV gains from earnings-driven credibility in safety regulations.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BWA over ALV, based on stronger trend consistency, superior year-to-date momentum at 24%, and favorable positioning in the EV supply chain amid analyst optimism. While ALV offers valuation appeal and recent earnings catalysts, BWA's relative outperformance and lower volatility profile suggest higher probability of continued upside in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a StrongBuy and BWA is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALV’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBWA’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- ALV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BWA’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- BWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +0.73% price change this week, while BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +8.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.88%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALV is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2026.
BWA is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.50% weekly)OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| ALV | BWA | ALV / BWA | |
| Capitalization | 9.86B | 15.7B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 1.43B | 104% |
| Gain YTD | 11.566 | 70.792 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.04 | 44.51 | 32% |
| Revenue | 11B | 14.3B | 77% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 901M | - |
| Total Debt | 2.25B | 4.07B | 55% |
ALV | BWA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 27 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 7 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALV's Valuation (10) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BWA (27). This means that ALV’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (51). This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.
ALV's SMR Rating (34) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (83). This means that ALV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALV (44). This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALV’s over the last 12 months.
BWA's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as ALV (33). This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to ALV’s over the last 12 months.
| ALV | BWA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 61% | 16 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 1 day ago 64% |
Advertisement
ALV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALV | 100% | -0.96% | ||
| LEA - ALV | 72% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| VC - ALV | 69% Closely correlated | -0.61% | ||
| THRM - ALV | 67% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| APTV - ALV | 64% Loosely correlated | +4.02% | ||
| ADNT - ALV | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
More | ||||