Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BWLCX vs FFFMX
BWLCX vs FFFMX Comparison
Open Charts BWLCX vs FFFMX
BWLCX vs FFFMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. BWLCX (260M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than BWLCX: FFFMX (1.68) vs BWLCX (0.00). BWLCX was incepted earlier than FFFMX: BWLCX (14 years) vs FFFMX (6 years). BWLCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). BWLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). FFFMX has a lower initial minimum investment than BWLCX: FFFMX (250) vs BWLCX (1000). BWLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.04 vs. FFFMX (9.57). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. BWLCX (13.41).
| BWLCX | FFFMX | BWLCX / FFFMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.32 | 566% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.32 | 566% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.058 | 9.487 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 260M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.04 | 9.57 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.18 | 37.38 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.41 | 41.56 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.26 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement